Home » Posts tagged 'Shen Prize'
Tag Archives: Shen Prize
Yellow Journalism
By Hannah Cha, VI Form
Editor’s note: Hannah Cha is the recipient of the Shen Prize of 2024. The Shen Prize is awarded to the winner of a public speaking contest among Advanced United States History students on the topic of democracy.
A renowned author Oscar Wilde once said, “In America, the president reigns for four years, but journalism governs forever and ever.” Journalism is often referred to as the fourth estate, possessing both the explicit capacity of advocacy and the implicit ability to frame political issues. While serving as a primary disseminator of raw information, opinionated journalism has also served as a source of falsehood and bias—also famously called, yellow journalism.
Yellow journalism is a style of sensationalist reporting, often containing a degree of exaggeration and lurid details to attract readers. The term originated from the fierce rivalry between the two newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst. Their overheated competition eventually led to an indistinguishable amount of misleading and exaggerated news, hindering the primary definition of democracy in the country. Historians note that unbiased political discourse, free from external influences, fosters public opinions crucial for achieving true democracy in America. Unfortunately, mass media in the late 19th century did not support this primary right.
During the height of their rivalry, Pulitzer and Hearst transformed journalism into their battleground where sensationalism reigned supreme. Not even two days after the explosion of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, newspapers were dominated with headlines such as “Maine Explosion Caused by Bomb or Torpedo?” or “Spain Guilty!,” directly accusing Spain of the phenomenon. This inflammatory rhetoric not only fueled war sentiments but also exerted pressure on the political leaders to take decisive action against Spain, contributing to the Spanish-American War. In their pursuit of profit and influence, Pulitzer and Hearst blurred the lines of journalism and propaganda, leaving a lasting legacy of yellow journalism in the history of American media.
Regardless of the questions arising from the credibility of the newspapers, it was evident that these journals served as a huge media platform. A photo of the New York Journal Office proudly displays the newspaper’s circulation of over 1.3 million copies in a day. Beyond the initial roles of conveying information, newspapers in the era were powerful agents of societal impact, shaping the collective consciousness of a society.
The era of yellow journalism was characterized by sensationalism, moral degradation, and a disregard for factual accuracy. Drawing parallels to modern times, where media platforms are indispensable as sources of information, the relevance of combating misinformation is more critical than ever. Looking into the history of yellow journalism and its impact on the public serves as a reminder for both journalists and citizens to uphold ethical standards and prioritize integrity over the allure of sensationalism.
The Shen Prize: The Enduring Constitutional Shield of the Warren Court
By Katelyn Yang, VI Form
The Shen Speech Prize: The Enduring Constitutional Shield of the Warren Court
Editor’s Note: The Shen Prize is awarded to the winner of a public speaking contest among Advanced Placement United States History students on the topic of democracy. The prize is given by Y.L. Shen in honor of his daughters, Ing-ie (Ava) Shen of the Class of 1988 and Ing-Chuan (Judy) Shen of the Class of 1989.
Inscribed on the headstone of former Chief Justice Earl Warren are some of these words that bear a powerful message even today: “Where there is injustice, we should correct it; Where there is neglect, we should provide care; And wherever corrections are achieved, we should add them permanently to our storehouse of treasures.”
We enjoy many rights and freedoms from the Warren Court’s ‘storehouse of treasures.’ This U.S. Supreme Court served from 1953 to 1969 and arguably did more to advance individual rights and liberties than any court before or after. Such rights and liberties are vital to a functioning democracy as they allow citizens to participate fully and effectively. However, they were not always respected by governing majorities.
The Warren Court sought to create a ‘constitutional shield’ against the tyranny of the majority. By striking down discriminatory laws, the Court expanded democracy by extending the Bill of Rights protections to more Americans. By recognizing privacy and voting rights, the Court broadened individual liberties. Moreover, the Court’s accomplishments remind us that when American institutions act with empathy and courage, they can bring the nation closer to a true democracy.
(more…)The Shen Prize: The Ongoing Struggle Against the Corrupting Influence of Money in Politics
By Alden Mehta, V Form
The Shen Speech Prize: The Ongoing Struggle Against the Corrupting Influence of Money in Politics
THE SHEN PRIZE is awarded to the winner of a public speaking contest among Advanced Placement United States History students on the topic of democracy. The prize is given by Y.L. Shen in honor of his daughters, Ing-ie (Ava) Shen of the Class of 1988 and Ing-Chuan (Judy) Shen of the Class of 1989.
Is it possible for influence in American politics to be bought? The answer is yes. In theory, a true democracy adequately represents the voice of its people, showing no bias towards status, identity, or wealth. We should see this representation reflected in the profiles of the politicians elected through the democratic process. However, in the US, political candidates rely on generous contributions from the wealthy to fund increasingly expensive campaign efforts. Through these contributions, the rich gain a degree of undue influence in politics; instead of reflecting the concerns of their electoral bases and amplifying the voices of the general public, we see politicians prioritizing the interests of their biggest donors. Campaign funding, rather than public interest, drives their work. This hole in American democracy led to the enactment of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), authored by Senator John Pastore (D-RI), in 1974. FECA sought to remove the corrupting influence of money from politics. Ultimately, FECA did not eliminate the importance of money in politics, but was still an expansion of democracy in the US because it set a lasting standard for campaign spending and contributions and increased government regulation in order to limit the influence of money in politics.
(more…)Shen Prize Winner “Women in World War II: Women’s Army Corps to Second Wave Feminist Movement”
By Cadence Summers, VI Form
Women in World War II: Women’s Army Corps to Second Wave Feminist Movement
Editor’s Note: The Shen Prize is a speech competition for V Formers responding to the prompt: What is a moment of significant expansion or contraction of United States’ democracy? The 2020 recipient of the Shen Prize was Catie Summers.
“For all the girls in the [Women’s Auxiliary Ferrying Squadrons], I think the most concrete moment of happiness came at our first review. Suddenly and for the first time, we felt a part of something larger. Because of our uniforms, which we had earned, we were marching with the men, marching with all the freedom-loving people in the world.” This is an excerpt from the poem At Twilight’s Last Gleaming, written by Cornelia Fort, one of the first woman pilots in the United States.
During World War II, the United States government drafted as many male soldiers as possible. Although thousands were automatically selected, just as many were needed to stay on the homefront to support the war effort through non-combat roles, which prompted the government to replace men in the workforce with women. During wartime, women’s employment rate increased 25%, and over 350,000 women served in the U.S. military. This increase in women’s employment and the diversification of jobs available to them is an expansion of American democracy. American democracy is fluid, ever-changing, and situational. As the country adapts and advances, so too does its democracy. These fluctuations occur in time with shifts in political climates thus the inclusivity and definition of American democracy at a given time correlates to the status of the country at that time. The introduction of the Women’s Army Corps, also known as WAC, during World War II represents an expansion of American Democracy due to the situational requirements of a nation at war. This expansion not only gave women the option to support the war effort by taking on traditionally male roles in the workforce and military, but also for the duration of the war, granted these women access to a society in which their work and contributions outside of the home were as valued as those within it.
(more…)

